Skip to main content Skip to main navigation Skip to utility navigation Skip to footer

Wet Versus Ery PU for Headliner Substrates—Which is Better?

Wet versus dry polyurethane foam. Thermoset vs thermoform. Which is better?

We partnered with a headliner manufacturer which uses both wet and dry processes to validate how Stratas 3D™, our latest generation of “dry” thermoform substrate boards, performs against typical in-production “wet” thermoset PU constructions for strength at room temperature, strength at elevated temperature, sag via weighted cantilever and environmental stability. Four in-production wet substrate boards were chosen to reflect the headliner market, with weights of 850GSM, 740GSM, 535GSM and 485GSM. Weight and thickness matching Stratas 3D™ substrate boards were then built for comparison.

Stratas 3D™ significantly outperformed its wet counterpart

At heavier weights (850GSM, 740gSM) Stratas 3D™ dry substrate boards performed just as well as wet headliner substrates. At lighter weights and thinner profiles, where the industry trend is heading, Stratas 3D™ significantly outperformed its wet counterpart. While the general market perception of wet being “better” than dry could have merit with other thermoform substrates, it simply isn’t true for Stratas 3D™, our latest generation of thermoformable headliner substrates.

View All News
Corporate Responsibility Image

Woodbridge Cares

Our community involvement initiative, Woodbridge Cares, inspires teammates to contribute to their communities through volunteerism and philanthropy.

Corporate Responsibility
partnerships widget


We’ve established strategic partnerships that allow us to deliver fully-integrated systems and solutions anytime, anywhere.